아래의 내용은 comment by contribution(novelty)의 한 가지 형태로 볼 수 있습니다.
기존의 연구와 비교하여 제가 투고한 manuscript에서는 novelty를 전혀 찾아볼 수 없다는 어느 한 reviewer의 커멘트입니다.
최종판정은 completely reject이었습니다.
——
On the whole it has a good experimental design, with a well-founded methodology, and detailed reporting of results. However, although the quality of the writing is good and detailed and the studies seem sound, the progress in extending current understanding of these different representation formats is unclear. Perhaps the authors need to articulate more clearly in the introduction how it builds on the previous work mentioned, specify where these works are lacking and detail exactly what is new about the work that is being presented here. The authors should also do this in more depth in the discussion section, so that it is clear to the reader what is new about their findings.
——